From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elkman v. Cord

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 12, 2013
112 A.D.3d 489 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-12-12

Steven Munro ELKMAN, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Barry CORD, Defendant–Appellant.

Russ & Russ, P.C., Massapequa (Jay Edmond Russ of counsel), for appellant. Robert E. Michael & Associates, PLLC, New York (Robert E. Michael of counsel), for respondent.


Russ & Russ, P.C., Massapequa (Jay Edmond Russ of counsel), for appellant. Robert E. Michael & Associates, PLLC, New York (Robert E. Michael of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Anil C. Singh, J.), entered October 18, 2012, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendant's cross motion to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(2), unanimously affirmed, with costs.

As the record shows that plaintiff timely filed a summons and complaint commencing the action, and paid the applicable filing fee, Supreme Court properly determined that the purported error in the method of the initial filing could be corrected or disregarded pursuant to CPLR 2001 ( see Goldenberg v. Westchester County Health Care Corp., 16 N.Y.3d 323, 921 N.Y.S.2d 619, 946 N.E.2d 717 [2011] ).

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them unavailing. MAZZARELLI, J.P., SWEENY, DeGRASSE, MANZANET–DANIELS, FEINMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Elkman v. Cord

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 12, 2013
112 A.D.3d 489 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Elkman v. Cord

Case Details

Full title:Steven Munro ELKMAN, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Barry CORD…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 12, 2013

Citations

112 A.D.3d 489 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
112 A.D.3d 489
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 8354

Citing Cases

Arango v. Atl. Westerly Co.

Plaintiff and the third-party defendant were therefore not called upon to file substantive opposition papers,…