From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elk v. Von Blanckensee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Jun 24, 2021
No. CV 20-300-TUC-JAS (MSA) (D. Ariz. Jun. 24, 2021)

Opinion

CV 20-300-TUC-JAS (MSA)

06-24-2021

Tyree Yellow Elk, Petitioner, v. Barbara Von Blanckensee, Respondent.


ORDER

HONORABLE JAMES A.SOTO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Aguilera. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence.

The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Aguilera's recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F.Supp.2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) Magistrate Judge Aguilera's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19) is accepted and adopted.

(2) As to the petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1), Ground Two and Ground Three are denied and Ground One and Ground Four are dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

(3) This case is dismissed; the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case.


Summaries of

Elk v. Von Blanckensee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Jun 24, 2021
No. CV 20-300-TUC-JAS (MSA) (D. Ariz. Jun. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Elk v. Von Blanckensee

Case Details

Full title:Tyree Yellow Elk, Petitioner, v. Barbara Von Blanckensee, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Jun 24, 2021

Citations

No. CV 20-300-TUC-JAS (MSA) (D. Ariz. Jun. 24, 2021)