From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elizonda v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jul 8, 2011
373 P.3d 911 (Nev. 2011)

Opinion

No. 58511.

07-08-2011

Zeferino ELIZONDA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Zeferino Elizonda Law Offices of John P. Parris Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney


Zeferino Elizonda

Law Offices of John P. Parris

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a district court order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 871 P.2d 944 (1994). Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Valorie Vega, Judge. The notice of appeal filed on May 16, 2011, was untimely because it was filed well after the 30–day appeal period prescribed by NRAP 4(b) and NRS 34.575(1). See Lozada, 110 Nev. at 352, 871 P.2d at 946 (an untimely appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court). To the extent that appellant is attempting to appeal from a district court order denying a “motion for clarification and correction of judicial record i.e. to status and counsel,” the appeal is untimely and no statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from such an order. See NRAP 4(b) ; NRS 34.575(1) ; Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) ; Lozada, 110 Nev. at 352, 871 P.2d at 946.

Therefore we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Elizonda v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jul 8, 2011
373 P.3d 911 (Nev. 2011)
Case details for

Elizonda v. State

Case Details

Full title:Zeferino ELIZONDA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Jul 8, 2011

Citations

373 P.3d 911 (Nev. 2011)