Opinion
March 4, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vinik, J.).
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied in its entirety.
Summary judgment was improperly granted to the plaintiff on the first cause of action as there are questions of fact in this case including, among others, the parties' intentions as to the date of closing, and whether the plaintiff buyer was ready, willing, and able to close on October 15, 1987. Brown, J.P., Eiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.