From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eliassian v. Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 5, 2002
300 A.D.2d 51 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2441

December 5, 2002.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saralee Evans, J.), entered on or about March 19, 2002, which, inter alia, denied the cross motion of defendant 46-47 L.L.C. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

David Demaggio, for defendants.

Before: TOM, J.P., MAZZARELLI, BUCKLEY, SULLIVAN, LERNER, JJ.


Plaintiff was allegedly injured as a consequence of tripping upon a shunt board that had been placed on an area of the sidewalk abutting defendant-appellant 46-47 L.L.C.'s (46-47) premises to cover temporary cables, laid by defendant Consolidated Edison to restore electricity to 46-47's premises. Inasmuch as there is a triable factual issue as to whether the placement of shunt boards under these circumstances constituted a special use of the sidewalk by 46-47 giving rise to a duty on 46-47's part to maintain the provisional sidewalk structure, 46-47's cross motion for summary judgment was properly denied (see Karr v. City of New York, 161 A.D.2d 449).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Eliassian v. Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 5, 2002
300 A.D.2d 51 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Eliassian v. Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y

Case Details

Full title:AGHAJAN ELIASSIAN, Plaintiff-respondent, v. CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 5, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 51 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
751 N.Y.S.2d 15

Citing Cases

Doyley v. Steiner

Defendant property owners failed to establish, as a matter of law, that they had no duty to maintain the…

Sheehy v. N.Y

This evidence tended to show that while Superior did not itself make "cuts" in the sidewalk, defendant Con…