Opinion
Case No. 4:13-cv-00919-YGR
03-18-2013
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, and IMCLONE SYSTEMS LLC, Plaintiffs, v. GENENTECH, INC., and CITY OF HOPE Defendants.
DANIEL JOHNSON, JR. MICHAEL J. LYONS MICHAEL F. CARR WALTER SCOTT TESTER MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ROBERT SMYTH, PH.D. TODD B. BUCK, PH.D. Attorneys for Plaintiffs ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and IMCLONE SYSTEMS LLC DURIE TANGRI LLP DARALYN J. DURE (SBN 169825) DAVID McGOWAN (SBN 154289) GENEVIEVE P. ROSLOFF (SBN 258234) Attorneys for Defendant GENENTECH, INC. DAVID I. GINDLER (SBN 117824) JOSEPH M. LIPNER (SBN 155735) IRELL & MANELLA LLP Attorney for Defendant CITY OF HOPE
DANIEL JOHNSON, JR.
MICHAEL J. LYONS
MICHAEL F. CARR
WALTER SCOTT TESTER
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
ROBERT SMYTH, PH.D.
TODD B. BUCK, PH.D.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and
IMCLONE SYSTEMS LLC
DURIE TANGRI LLP
DARALYN J. DURE (SBN 169825)
DAVID McGOWAN (SBN 154289)
GENEVIEVE P. ROSLOFF (SBN 258234)
Attorneys for Defendant
GENENTECH, INC.
DAVID I. GINDLER (SBN 117824)
JOSEPH M. LIPNER (SBN 155735)
IRELL & MANELLA LLP
Attorney for Defendant
CITY OF HOPE
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
STIPULATED EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT
FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY, UNENFORCEABILITY, AND NONINFRINGEMENT
Judge: Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
Plaintiffs Eli Lilly and Company and ImClone Systems LLC (collectively "Lilly") and Defendants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope (collectively "Defendants"), pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, respectfully request that the Court enter the following stipulation regarding the time for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint for Declaratory Judgment of Invalidity, Unenforceability, and Noninfringement. The parties now AGREE and STIPULATE to extend the time to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint by thirty days, from March 22, 2013 to April 22, 2013.
1. Reason for the Extension of Time.
At the request of Defendants, the parties have met and conferred and jointly agree, for the convenience of the parties, to the requested extension.
2. Prior Time Modifications.
There have been no previous time modifications in this case.
3. Effect of Modification.
The requested extension will have no effect on the rest of the schedule in this action.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
By: _____________
DANIEL JOHNSON, JR.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and
IMCLONE SYSTEMS LLC
DURIE TANGRI LLP
By: _____________
DARALYN J. DURIE
Attorneys for Defendant
GENENTECH, INC.
IRELL & MANELLA LLP
By: ____________
DAVID I. GINDLER
Attorney for Defendant
CITY OF HOPE
FILER'S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I, Daralyn J. Durie, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.
___________
DARALYN J. DURIE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that all counsel of record is being served on March 18, 2013 with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system.
____________
Daralyn J. Durie