Opinion
Civil Action No. 3:04-CV-2681-M.
August 9, 2005
ORDER
The Court concludes that Defendant Angel Espinoza should be dismissed from this case, because there is no legal theory on which the Plaintiff can conceivably recover from him. When this case was removed from state court, the Plaintiff claimed that Espinoza was fraudulently joined, tendering to the Court undisputed evidence that Espinoza was not employed at the store where Plaintiff was injured and had no responsibilities at that location. Plaintiff never provided any responsive evidence. The Court concludes that Espinoza was fraudulently joined and that he should, therefore, be dismissed with prejudice from this case. All of his costs are taxed against the Plaintiff.
SO ORDERED.