From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elhoor v. the Home Depot USA, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Aug 9, 2005
Civil Action No. 3:04-CV-2681-M (N.D. Tex. Aug. 9, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:04-CV-2681-M.

August 9, 2005


ORDER


The Court concludes that Defendant Angel Espinoza should be dismissed from this case, because there is no legal theory on which the Plaintiff can conceivably recover from him. When this case was removed from state court, the Plaintiff claimed that Espinoza was fraudulently joined, tendering to the Court undisputed evidence that Espinoza was not employed at the store where Plaintiff was injured and had no responsibilities at that location. Plaintiff never provided any responsive evidence. The Court concludes that Espinoza was fraudulently joined and that he should, therefore, be dismissed with prejudice from this case. All of his costs are taxed against the Plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Elhoor v. the Home Depot USA, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Aug 9, 2005
Civil Action No. 3:04-CV-2681-M (N.D. Tex. Aug. 9, 2005)
Case details for

Elhoor v. the Home Depot USA, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NANCY ELHOOR, Plaintiff, v. THE HOME DEPOT USA, INC., DBA THE HOME DEPOT…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Aug 9, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:04-CV-2681-M (N.D. Tex. Aug. 9, 2005)