From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elefantis v. P.O.P. Displays

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 2, 2007
44 A.D.3d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2006-11907.

October 2, 2007.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated September 12, 2006, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

John P. Humphreys, New York, N.Y. (Evy L. Kazansky of counsel), for appellants.

Max D. Leifer, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Ira H. Zuckerman of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Skelos and Carni, JJ.


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability is denied.

In support of his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, the plaintiff submitted evidence demonstrating that the defendant Antonio Marcial was negligent in backing the tractor-trailer owned by the defendant P.O.P. Displays, Inc., into the plaintiffs parked vehicle ( see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1211 [a]; Ortiz v Calavera, 26 AD3d 319; Garcia v Verizon N.Y., Inc., 10 AD3d 339). However, in opposition, the defendants submitted competent evidence directly contradicting the plaintiffs version of how the accident occurred and raised a triable issue of fact on the issue of whether the plaintiffs vehicle was parked or standing behind the tractor-trailer at any time prior to the accident. Accordingly, the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability should have been denied.


Summaries of

Elefantis v. P.O.P. Displays

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 2, 2007
44 A.D.3d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Elefantis v. P.O.P. Displays

Case Details

Full title:KLEOMENIS ELEFANTIS, Respondent, v. P.O.P. DISPLAYS, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 2, 2007

Citations

44 A.D.3d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 7392
843 N.Y.S.2d 359

Citing Cases

Logan v. Apex Express, Inc.

The CBT defendants established, prima facie, that the operator of the Apex vehicle was solely at fault in the…

Salomon v. Katos

Here, the defendant's affidavit completely contradicted the plaintiff's version of the accident stating that…