From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Electrograph Sys. Inc. v. Epson Imaging Devices Corp. (In re TFT-LCD Antitrust Litig.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)
Oct 6, 2011
Case No. M 3:07-md-1827 SI; MDL 1827 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. M 3:07-md-1827 SI; MDL 1827 Individual Case No. 3:10-cv-0117 SI

10-06-2011

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates To Individual Case No.: 3:10-cv-0117 SI ELECTROGRAPH SYSTEMS, INC.; ELECTROGRAPH TECHNOLOGIES, CORP. Plaintiffs, v. EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, et al. Defendants.

KENT M. ROGER, State Bar No. 95987 HERMAN J. HOYING, State Bar No. 257495 JENNIFER L. CALVERT, State Bar No. 258018 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Attorneys for Defendants HITACHI, LTD., HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD., HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC. Kent M. Roger (Bar No. 95987) Jennifer L. Calvert (Bar No. 258018) MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd. and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. Michael R. Lazerwitz (PRO HAC VICE) Jeremy J. Calsyn (Bar No. 205062) Lee F. Berger (Bar No. 222756) CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP Attorneys for Defendants LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc. Christopher A. Nedeau Carl L. Blumenstein Allison Dibley NOSSAMAN LLP Attorneys for Defendants AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation America Melvin R. Goldman (Bar No. 34097) Stephen P. Freccero (Bar. No 131093) Derek F. Foran (Bar No. 224569) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Attorneys for Defendants Epson Imaging Devices Corporation and Epson Electronics America, Inc. Hugh F. Bangasser ( pro hac vice ) Ramona M. Emerson ( pro hac vice ) K&L GATES LLP Jeffrey L. Bornstein (Bar No. 99358) K&L GATES LLP Counsel for Defendant HannStar Display Corporation Robert Wick ( pro hac vice ) Neil Roman ( pro hac vice ) Derek Ludwin (pro hac vice) COVINGTON & BURLING LLP Attorneys for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. John M. Grenfell (Bar No. 88500) Jacob R. Sorensen (Bar No. 209134) Fusae Nara ( pro hac vice ) Andrew D. Lanphere (Bar No. 191479) PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP Attorneys for Defendants Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corp. John H. Chung ( pro hac vice ) WHITE & CASE LLP Christopher M. Curran ( pro hac vice ) Kristen J. McAhren ( pro hac vice ) WHITE & CASE LLP Attorneys for Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. Philip J. Iovieno ( pro hac vice ) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs Electrograph Systems, Inc. and Electrograph Technologies, Corp.


KENT M. ROGER, State Bar No. 95987

HERMAN J. HOYING, State Bar No. 257495

JENNIFER L. CALVERT, State Bar No. 258018

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

Attorneys for Defendants

HITACHI, LTD., HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD.,

HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC.

[Additional defendants and counsel listed on signature pages]

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING ANSWERS TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

Honorable Susan Illston

WHEREAS, plaintiffs Electrograph Systems, Inc. and Electrograph Technologies, Corp. ("Electrograph") filed the above captioned lawsuit on November 6, 2009 ("Complaint");

WHEREAS, defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Epson Electronics America, Inc., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd., LG Display Co., Ltd., LG Display America, Inc., AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and HannStar Display Corporation ("Stipulating Defendants") filed answers to the Complaint on March 15, 2010;

WHEREAS, pursuant to this Court's order dated August 29, 2011 on Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd.'s ("Mitsui Taiwan") motion for judgment on the pleadings for lack of personal jurisdiction, which granted Electrograph "leave to amend its complaint to set forth its theory of jurisdiction" over Mitsui Taiwan (MDL Dkt. No. 3395), Electrograph filed an amended complaint on September 23, 2011 ("Amended Complaint") identical to the Complaint with regard to allegations concerning the Stipulating Defendants, but adding allegations regarding defendant Mitsui Taiwan;

WHEREAS, response(s) to the Amended Complaint must be filed by October 10, 2011;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Electrograph, on the one hand, and the Stipulating Defendants on the other hand, as follows:

1. Stipulating Defendants' respective answers, filed on March 15, 2010, to the allegations in Electrograph's Complaint are hereby deemed responsive to the corresponding allegations in Electrograph's Amended Complaint and no further responsive pleading on behalf of the Stipulating Defendants to Electrograph's Amended Complaint shall be required.

2. To the extent Electrograph's Amended Complaint contains any additional or substantively revised allegations to which a response may be deemed to be required from the Stipulating Defendants, such allegations are hereby deemed denied.

Kent M. Roger (Bar No. 95987)

Jennifer L. Calvert (Bar No. 258018)

MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd. and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.

Michael R. Lazerwitz (PRO HAC VICE)

Jeremy J. Calsyn (Bar No. 205062)

Lee F. Berger (Bar No. 222756)

CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP

Attorneys for Defendants LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc.

Christopher A. Nedeau

Carl L. Blumenstein

Allison Dibley

NOSSAMAN LLP

Attorneys for Defendants AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation America

Melvin R. Goldman (Bar No. 34097)

Stephen P. Freccero (Bar. No 131093)

Derek F. Foran (Bar No. 224569)

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

Attorneys for Defendants Epson Imaging Devices Corporation and Epson Electronics America, Inc.

Hugh F. Bangasser (pro hac vice)

Ramona M. Emerson (pro hac vice)

K&L GATES LLP

Jeffrey L. Bornstein (Bar No. 99358)

K&L GATES LLP

Counsel for Defendant HannStar Display Corporation

Robert Wick (pro hac vice)

Neil Roman (pro hac vice)

Derek Ludwin (pro hac vice)

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP

Attorneys for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

John M. Grenfell (Bar No. 88500)

Jacob R. Sorensen (Bar No. 209134)

Fusae Nara (pro hac vice)

Andrew D. Lanphere (Bar No. 191479)

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP

Attorneys for Defendants Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corp.

John H. Chung (pro hac vice)

WHITE & CASE LLP

Christopher M. Curran (pro hac vice)

Kristen J. McAhren (pro hac vice)

WHITE & CASE LLP

Attorneys for Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.

Philip J. Iovieno (pro hac vice)

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Electrograph Systems, Inc. and Electrograph Technologies, Corp.

FILER'S ATTESTATION

I, Kent M. Roger, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Michael Lazertwitz, Christopher Nedeau, Melvin Goldman, Hugh Bangasser, Robert Wick, John Grenfell, John Chung, and Philip Iovieno concur in this filing.

Kent M. Roger

Attorneys for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi

Displays, Ltd., and Hitachi Electronic Devices

(USA), Inc.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation set forth above and pursuant to Rule 6-1(a) of the Civil Local Rules, IT IS SO ORDERED.

HON. SUSAN ILLSTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Electrograph Sys. Inc. v. Epson Imaging Devices Corp. (In re TFT-LCD Antitrust Litig.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)
Oct 6, 2011
Case No. M 3:07-md-1827 SI; MDL 1827 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Electrograph Sys. Inc. v. Epson Imaging Devices Corp. (In re TFT-LCD Antitrust Litig.)

Case Details

Full title:IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates To…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION)

Date published: Oct 6, 2011

Citations

Case No. M 3:07-md-1827 SI; MDL 1827 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)