Eleazer v. Hughey

Full title: Arthur Eleazer, Respondent, v. Leslie Hughey, Petitioner.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Date published: Dec 30, 2020

Appellate Case No. 2019-001191 (S.C. Dec. 30, 2020)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2019-001191 Memorandum Opinion No. 2020-MO-017

12-30-2020

Arthur Eleazer, Respondent, v. Leslie Hughey, Petitioner.

Brett Lamb Stevens, Stevens Law, LLC; Bryan D. Caskey, Caskey & Imgrund, LLC, both of Columbia, for Petitioner. Katherine Carruth Goode, of Winnsboro; Kenneth M. Mathews, of Columbia, both for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appeal from Richland County
Monét S. Pincus, Family Court Judge

CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

Brett Lamb Stevens, Stevens Law, LLC; Bryan D. Caskey, Caskey & Imgrund, LLC, both of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Katherine Carruth Goode, of Winnsboro; Kenneth M. Mathews, of Columbia, both for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : We granted Leslie Hughey's petition for a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Eleazer v. Hughey, Op. No. 2019-UP-178 (S.C. Ct. App. filed May 22, 2019). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.