From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eldridge v. U.S. Dep't of Justice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Oct 14, 2016
Case: 1:16-mc-02169 (D.D.C. Oct. 14, 2016)

Opinion

Case: 1:16-mc-02169

10-14-2016

CLINTON T. ELDRIDGE, Petitioner, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Respondents.


Assigned To : Unassigned
Assign. Date : 10/20/2016
Description: Miscellaneous MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"), unless a prisoner "is under imminent danger of serious physical injury," he may not proceed in forma pauperis if while incarcerated he has filed at least three prior cases that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); see Ibrahim v. District of Columbia, 463 F.3d 3, 6 (D.C. Cir. 2006). Because the petitioner has accumulated at least three strikes, see Eldridge v. Tucker, No. 99-0061 (D.D.C. June 6, 2000), and because he does not allege that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury, his application to proceed in forma pauperis must be denied.

It is hereby

ORDERED that the petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. It is further

ORDERED that this miscellaneous action is DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

United States District Judge DATE: 10/14/2016


Summaries of

Eldridge v. U.S. Dep't of Justice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Oct 14, 2016
Case: 1:16-mc-02169 (D.D.C. Oct. 14, 2016)
Case details for

Eldridge v. U.S. Dep't of Justice

Case Details

Full title:CLINTON T. ELDRIDGE, Petitioner, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Oct 14, 2016

Citations

Case: 1:16-mc-02169 (D.D.C. Oct. 14, 2016)