Summary
In Eldred v. Williamson, 33 Ill.App.2d 10, 178 N.E.2d 414 (1961), although the facts do not appear, it was said, "Evidence was sufficient to support defense of usury in mortgage foreclosure action, predicated upon alleged lender's retention of sum as commission over and above legal rate of interest."
Summary of this case from Grundel v. Bank of CraigOpinion
Gen. No. 48,294. (Abstract of Decision.)
October 25, 1961. Rehearing denied November 27, 1961.
Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. GROVER C. NIEMEYER, Judge, presiding. Reversed and remanded with directions.
Archibald J. Carey, Jr., and James T. Horton, of Chicago, for appellants;
James D. Murphy, of Chicago (James D. Murphy, Jr., of counsel), for appellee.
Not to be published in full.