From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elder v. Ford

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division
Jan 20, 2006
No. 05-2180 (W.D. Ark. Jan. 20, 2006)

Summary

denying in forma pauperis status for plaintiff with $1650 in bank and two vehicles

Summary of this case from Macon v. Cedarcroft Health Servs., Inc.

Opinion

No. 05-2180.

January 20, 2006


ORDER


Now on this 20th day of January 2006, comes on for consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on December 29, 2005, by the Honorable Beverly Stites Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 4.) Plaintiff has filed written objections to the report and recommendation. (Doc. 7.)

The court has reviewed this case de novo and finds that plaintiff's objections are without merit and that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED and plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED on the grounds that plaintiff's claims are frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Elder v. Ford

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division
Jan 20, 2006
No. 05-2180 (W.D. Ark. Jan. 20, 2006)

denying in forma pauperis status for plaintiff with $1650 in bank and two vehicles

Summary of this case from Macon v. Cedarcroft Health Servs., Inc.
Case details for

Elder v. Ford

Case Details

Full title:VIRGINIA A. ELDER, Plaintiff v. MARK FORD, Attorney, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division

Date published: Jan 20, 2006

Citations

No. 05-2180 (W.D. Ark. Jan. 20, 2006)

Citing Cases

Macon v. Cedarcroft Health Servs., Inc.

See, e.g., In re Truong, 335 F. App'x 156, 158 (3d Cir. 2009) (upholding denial of in forma pauperis motion…