From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elbert v. Swarthout

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 11, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1154 EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 11, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-1154 EFB P.

May 11, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request counsel voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The court finds that there are no exceptional circumstances in this case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's April 29, 2011, request for appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Elbert v. Swarthout

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 11, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1154 EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Elbert v. Swarthout

Case Details

Full title:VIRGIL ROBERT ELBERT, Plaintiff, v. GARY SWARTHOUT, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 11, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-1154 EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 11, 2011)