ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORP. v. PIXCIR MICROELECTRONICS

Full title: ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. PIXCIR MICROELECTRONICS…

Court: United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Oct 24, 2011

Case No. 2:10-cv-00014-GMN-(PAL) (D. Nev. Oct. 24, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-cv-00014-GMN-(PAL).

October 24, 2011

SEAN P. DEBRUINE (admitted pro hac vice), ALSTON BIRD LLP, Menlo Park, California, ROBERT J. CALDWELL (Bar No. 007637), KOLESAR LEATHAM, CHTD., MATTHEW J. CHRISTIAN (Bar No. 008024), E. DANIEL KIDD (Bar No. 010106), KOLESAR LEATHAM, CHTD., Las Vegas, Nevada, Attorneys for Plaintiff, ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION.

ORDER GRANTING ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION'S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

GLORIA NAVARRO, District JudgePage 2

The Court has received plaintiff Elan Microelectronics Corporation's Motion to File Under Seal, filed on October 21, 2011. Good cause appearing, Elan's motion is hereby GRANTED. It is hereby ORDERED that the following documents may be filed under seal:

1. Elan Microelectronics Corporation's Opposition to Pixcir Microelectronics Co. Ltd.'s ("Pixcir's") Renewed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction.

2. [Proposed] Order Denying Pixcir's Renewed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction.

3. Elan's Motion for Sanctions for Pixcir's Abuse of the Judicial Process.

4. Declaration of Sean P. DeBruine in Support of Elan's (1) Opposition to Pixcir's Renewed Motion to Dismiss, (2) Motion for Sanctions for Abuse of the Judicial Process, and (3) Motion for Sanctions for Failure to Provide Discovery.

5. Exhibits G-O to the Declaration of Sean P. DeBruine in Support of Elan's (1) Opposition to Pixcir's Renewed Motion to Dismiss, (2) Motion for Sanctions for Abuse of the Judicial Process, and (3) Motion for Sanctions for Failure to Provide Discovery.

IT IS SO ORDERED.