From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elan Microelectronics Corp. v. Apple Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 24, 2011
Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)

10-24-2011

ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. APPLE INC., Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.

Sean P. DeBruine ALSTON & BIRD LLP Attorneys For Elan Microelectronics Corporation Sonal N. Mehta WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP Attorneys for Apple Inc.


YITAI HU (SBN 248085)

SEAN P. DEBRUINE (SBN 168071)

ELIZABETH H. RADER (SBN 184963)

JANE HAN BU (SBN 240081)

JENNIFER LIU (SBN 268990)

PALANI P. RATHINASAMY (SBN 269852)

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ELAN MICROELECTRONICS

CORPORATION

MATTHEW D. POWERS (Bar No. 104795)

TENSEGRITY LAW GROUP LLP

JARED BOBROW (Bar No. 133712)

SONAL N. MEHTA (Bar No. 222086)

DEREK WALTER (Bar No. 246322)

NATHAN GREENBLATT (Bar No. 262279)

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

Attorneys for Defendant and

Counterclaim Plaintiff,

APPLE INC.

SECOND STIPULATION AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND

DEADLINES TO ALLOW FOR

FINALIZATION OF SETTLEMENT

Hon. Richard Seeborg

Defendant Apple, Inc. ("Apple") and Plaintiff Elan Microelectronics Corporation ("Elan"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on September 21, 2011, the parties attended a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Spero and reached an agreement in principle to settle this litigation (D.I. 432);

WHEREAS, on September 28, 2011, the Court entered a Stipulation and Order to Extend Deadlines to Allow for Finalization of Settlement (D.I. 434), extending the fact discovery cutoff in this case to October 31, 2011, extending the deadline for Apple to produce certain documents to October 28, 2011, and requiring the parties to work together to propose a revised case schedule in the event a settlement is not finalized;

WHEREAS, the parties continue to work on drafting a settlement agreement to formalize their agreement in principle to settle;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, that, subject to the Court's approval, that the close of fact discovery be further extended to November 30, 2011, and that the deadline for Apple to produce documents pursuant to Magistrate Judge Grewal's September 9, 2011 Order be further extended to November 28, 2011.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

Sean P. DeBruine

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

Attorneys For Elan Microelectronics Corporation

Sonal N. Mehta

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

Attorneys for Apple Inc.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

Honorable Richard Seeborg

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Elan Microelectronics Corp. v. Apple Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 24, 2011
Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Elan Microelectronics Corp. v. Apple Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 24, 2011

Citations

Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)