From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elam v. Cepts

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 20, 2021
2:21-cv-01455-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01455-TLN-KJN

09-20-2021

NATHANIEL ELAM, SR., Plaintiff, v. CEPTS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Troy L Nunley, United States District Judge

Plaintiff proceeds in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c).

On August 23, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 3), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No. objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 3) are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.


Summaries of

Elam v. Cepts

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 20, 2021
2:21-cv-01455-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Elam v. Cepts

Case Details

Full title:NATHANIEL ELAM, SR., Plaintiff, v. CEPTS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 20, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-01455-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)