Opinion
C23-1566 RSM
10-30-2023
ROY RASHAD WELLS EL, Plaintiff, v. FIRST TECH FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Defendant.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
MICHELLE L. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On October 10, 2023, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in the above-entitled action. (Dkt. # 1.) On October 16, 2023, the Court issued an order to show cause by October 27, 2023, why IFP should not be denied based on Plaintiff's omission of information necessary for the Court to determine his ability to pay. (Dkt. # 4.) Plaintiff failed to file any response. Accordingly, the Court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's IFP application be DENIED and Plaintiff directed to pay the filing fee. A proposed Order accompanies this Report and Recommendation.
Objections to this Report and Recommendation, if any, should be filed with the Clerk and served upon all parties to this suit within twenty-one (21) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is signed. Failure to file objections within the specified time may affect your right to appeal. Objections should be noted for consideration on the District Judge's motions calendar for the third Friday after they are filed. Responses to objections may be filed within fourteen (14) days after service of objections. If no timely objections are filed, the matter will be ready for consideration by the District Judge on November 24, 2023.
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and to the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez.