Opinion
Case No.: 2:19-cv-0951-JAD-EJY
11-09-2020
Roy El, Plaintiff v. City of Las Vegas Detention Center, Defendant
Order Adopting Report & Recommendation and Dismissing Action
[ECF No. 13]
Pro se plaintiff Roy El brings this action regarding his 2018 arrest and pretrial confinement. El's original complaint was dismissed with leave to amend and instructions for curing the defects. El filed an amended complaint, and the magistrate judge reviewed it. The magistrate judge opines that El still fails to state a viable claim and notes that he "has now submitted documentation that belies the ability to amend his complaint a third time to state viable . . . claims." So she recommends that I dismiss this case with prejudice because amendment would be futile. The deadline for El to object to that recommendation was November 4, 2020, and he filed no objection or request to extend that deadline. "[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation unless objections are filed." Having reviewed the report and recommendation, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do.
ECF No. 6.
ECF No. 12.
ECF No. 13 at 4.
Id.
Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). --------
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 13] is ADOPTED in its entirety. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim, and the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.
/s/_________
U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey
Dated: November 9, 2020