From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

El-Shaddai-Wilkerson v. Soto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 14, 2016
Case No. CV 15-6584 GHK(JC) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 15-6584 GHK(JC)

09-14-2016

ADONAI EL-SHADDAI-WILKERSON, Petitioner, v. JOHN SOTO, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody ("Petition") and accompanying documents, the submissions in connection with the Motion to Dismiss the Petition ("Motion to Dismiss"), and all of the records herein, including the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report and Recommendation"), and petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation ("Objections"). The Court has further made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge with the following modifications and overrules the Objections:

1. The sentence beginning on line 2 of page 6 of the Report and Recommendation is modified to read as follows: "Accordingly, the punishment that resulted from the allegedly unconstitutional disciplinary proceeding at issue has no bearing upon the fact or duration of petitioner's confinement because his term of life in prison was not extended and his minimum term of imprisonment could not have been shortened by the lost time credits."

2. The word "effect" on line 21 of page 6 of the Report and Recommendation is changed to the word "affect."

3. The parenthetical beginning on line 1 of page 7 of the Report and Recommendation is modified to read as follows: "(petitioner's claims seeking expungement of disciplinary conviction and restoration of time credit not cognizable on federal habeas review; punishment that resulted from allegedly unconstitutional disciplinary proceedings had no bearing on fact or duration of petitioner's confinement because petitioner was serving indeterminate life sentence, minimum eligible parole date had passed, and therefore, term of life in prison was not extended, and minimum term of imprisonment could not have been shortened by lost time credits)".

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss is granted and the Petition is dismissed. The Court declines to convert this action into a federal civil rights without prejudice to petitioner filing a separate federal civil rights action.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Report and Recommendation, and the Judgment herein on petitioner and counsel for respondent.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

DATED: 9/14/16

/s/_________

HONORABLE GEORGE H. KING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

El-Shaddai-Wilkerson v. Soto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 14, 2016
Case No. CV 15-6584 GHK(JC) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2016)
Case details for

El-Shaddai-Wilkerson v. Soto

Case Details

Full title:ADONAI EL-SHADDAI-WILKERSON, Petitioner, v. JOHN SOTO, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 14, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 15-6584 GHK(JC) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2016)