From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

El-Bey v. ADT Sec. Servs.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 20, 2022
21-CV-5211 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. May. 20, 2022)

Opinion

21-CV-5211 (LTS)

05-20-2022

QUEEN PRINYAH GODIAH P. PAYNES EL-BEY, Plaintiff, v. ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

By order dated April 18, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint within 30 days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the amended complaint. Plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint. Accordingly, the amended complaint, filed in forma pauperis (IFP) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

El-Bey v. ADT Sec. Servs.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 20, 2022
21-CV-5211 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. May. 20, 2022)
Case details for

El-Bey v. ADT Sec. Servs.

Case Details

Full title:QUEEN PRINYAH GODIAH P. PAYNES EL-BEY, Plaintiff, v. ADT SECURITY…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 20, 2022

Citations

21-CV-5211 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. May. 20, 2022)