From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ekelund v. Cardozo Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jun 9, 1933
248 N.W. 824 (Minn. 1933)

Opinion

No. 29,405.

June 9, 1933.

Workmen's compensation act — findings of industrial commission on question of fact.

The record presenting an issue of fact, denial of compensation by the industrial commission will not be disturbed.

Certiorari upon the relation of G.A. Ekelund, employe, to review an order of the industrial commission denying his claim for compensation. Affirmed.

Mark F. Crotty, for relator.

Robb, Rich Frohne, for respondents.



Certiorari to the industrial commission to review a denial of compensation.

An eye injury is involved, due, as relator claims, to a severe bump on the head, arising out of and in the course of his employment. His own testimony and that of a corroborating witness are in direct opposition to a reasonable inference from declarations made by relator to physicians immediately after the date of the alleged injury, September 27, 1929. Those declarations were silent, and so negative, as to trauma. The decision of the commission was put upon the ground that relator's subsequent testimonial narrative of preceding occupational injury was an afterthought. The record presents an issue of fact, the decision of which by the commission is final.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Ekelund v. Cardozo Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jun 9, 1933
248 N.W. 824 (Minn. 1933)
Case details for

Ekelund v. Cardozo Co.

Case Details

Full title:G. A. EKELUND v. W. N. CARDOZO COMPANY AND ANOTHER

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Jun 9, 1933

Citations

248 N.W. 824 (Minn. 1933)
248 N.W. 824