From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

E.K. v. Department of Children & Family Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 4, 2009
2 So. 3d 1067 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. 3D08-1931.

February 4, 2009.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mindy S. Glazer, Judge.

Joseph P. George, Jr., Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Third Region, and Richard F. Joyce, Executive Assistant Regional Counsel, for appellant.

Karla Perkins, Assistant District Legal Counsel, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, C.J., and RAMIREZ and ROTHENBERG, JJ.


E.K. appeals a final order placing his minor child in a permanent guardianship and terminating protective supervision, alleging error in the order's visitation provision. We affirm and remand.

The trial court orally directed that E.K. and the custodian work out a visitation arrangement. However, the written order states that visitation shall be at the discretion of the custodian. The written order should be corrected to reflect the oral pronouncement. See B.C. v. Dep't of Children Families, 864 So.2d 486, 488 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

Accordingly, we affirm the final order, but we remand to the trial court and direct the trial court to correct the written order to conform to the oral pronouncement.

Affirmed and remanded.


Summaries of

E.K. v. Department of Children & Family Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 4, 2009
2 So. 3d 1067 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

E.K. v. Department of Children & Family Services

Case Details

Full title:E.K., Appellant, v. The DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN FAMILY SERVICES, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 4, 2009

Citations

2 So. 3d 1067 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Citing Cases

A.M. v. Dep't of Children & Families

We remand the case so that the order can be amended to conform to the court's oral pronouncement that A.J.…