From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ejak v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 23, 2017
CASE NO.: SC16-2061 (Fla. Jun. 23, 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO.: SC16-2061

06-23-2017

AMER ALI EJAK Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA Respondent(s)


Lower Tribunal No(s).: 2D13-5332; 292009CF015728000BHC

Upon review of the response to this Court's Order to Show Cause dated December 29, 2016, the Court has determined that it should accept jurisdiction in this case consistent with Kelsey v. State, 206 So. 3d 5 (Fla. 2016). The State, in its response, concedes that Kelsey mandates resentencing in conformance with chapter 2014-220, Laws of Florida, which has been codified in sections 775.082, 921.1401, and 921.1402 of the Florida Statutes. It is therefore ordered that the Petition for Review is granted, that the Second District Court of Appeal's decision in this case is quashed, and that this matter is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with Kelsey.

No Motion for Rehearing will be entertained by the Court. LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur. A True Copy
Test: /s/_________
John A. Tomasino
Clerk, Supreme Court two
Served: MAUREEN E. SURBER
CERESE CRAWFORD TAYLOR
HON. PAT FRANK, CLERK
HON. MARY BETH KUENZEL, CLERK
HON. EMMETT LAMAR BATTLES, JUDGE


Summaries of

Ejak v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 23, 2017
CASE NO.: SC16-2061 (Fla. Jun. 23, 2017)
Case details for

Ejak v. State

Case Details

Full title:AMER ALI EJAK Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 23, 2017

Citations

CASE NO.: SC16-2061 (Fla. Jun. 23, 2017)