From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

EIT Holdings, LLC v. Priceline.Com, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 31, 2011
Case No. 3:11-cv-02468-MEJ (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-cv-02468-MEJ

10-31-2011

EIT HOLDINGS, LLC, a Delaware company Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. PRICELINE.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.

DURIE TANGRI LLP RYAN M. KENT Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff PRICELINE.COM, INC. GOLDSTEIN & LIPSKI, PLLC JODY M. GOLDSTEIN Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant EIT HOLDINGS, LLC


DURIE TANGRI LLP

DARALYN J DURIE (SBN 169825)

RYAN M. KENT (SBN 220441)

EUGENE NOVIKOV (SBN 257849)

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff

PRICELINE.COM, INC.

JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST PURSUANT

TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER TO EXTEND TIME

Judge: Honorable Maria-Elena James

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and 7-12 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b), Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant EIT Holdings, LLC ("EIT") and Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Priceline.com, Inc. ("Priceline.com") hereby request that the Court enter an order to extend the deadline to exchange disclosures of asserted claims and invalidity contentions from October 31, 2011 to November 4, 2011. This stipulated request is supported by the Declaration of Ryan M. Kent in Support of Joint Stipulated Request Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 for Extending Time ("Kent Decl."). In support of the parties' stipulated request, the parties state as follows:

1. Pursuant to the Court's August 29, 2011 Claim Construction Scheduling Order, the parties are to exchange disclosures of asserted claims and invalidity contentions on October 31, 2011.

2. The parties request that the disclosures of asserted claims and invalidity contentions be extended to November 4, 2011.

3. There have been no previous time modifications in this case, either by stipulation or court order. Kent Decl. ¶ 2.

For the foregoing reasons, the parties respectfully request that disclosures of asserted claims and invalidity contentions be extended to November 4, 2011.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

DURIE TANGRI LLP

RYAN M. KENT

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim

Plaintiff PRICELINE.COM, INC.

GOLDSTEIN & LIPSKI, PLLC

JODY M. GOLDSTEIN

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim

Defendant EIT HOLDINGS, LLC

I, Ryan M. Kent, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this document. Pursuant to General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that counsel for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Priceline.com, Inc. has concurred in this filing.

Ryan M. Kent

SO ORDERED.

MARIA-ELENA JAMES

United States Chief Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

EIT Holdings, LLC v. Priceline.Com, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 31, 2011
Case No. 3:11-cv-02468-MEJ (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)
Case details for

EIT Holdings, LLC v. Priceline.Com, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EIT HOLDINGS, LLC, a Delaware company Plaintiff and Counterclaim…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 31, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:11-cv-02468-MEJ (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2011)