From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eisenberg v. Grossman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 13, 1949
275 App. Div. 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

June 13, 1949.


In a derivative action by a stockholder, order denying motion of defendants to dismiss the amended complaint for insufficiency, insofar as appealed from, reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs, with leave to serve a further amended complaint within ten days from the entry of the order hereon if so advised. There is no allegation in the complaint complying with section 61 of the General Corporation Law which provides that "it must be made to appear that the plaintiff was a stockholder at the time of the transaction of which he complains". Carswell, Acting P.J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Eisenberg v. Grossman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 13, 1949
275 App. Div. 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

Eisenberg v. Grossman

Case Details

Full title:MILTON M. EISENBERG, as a Stockholder, Suing on Behalf of Himself and All…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 13, 1949

Citations

275 App. Div. 946 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Citing Cases

Northridge Cooperative Section No. 1, Inc. v. 32nd Avenue Construction Corp.

The second branch of the motion is made under rules 106 and 107 and affidavits are submitted. An attempt is…

NORTHRIDGE COOP. v. 32ND AVE. CONSTR. CORP.

The second branch of the motion is made under rules 106 and 107 and affidavits are submitted. An attempt is…