From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eisenberg v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
May 9, 1949
174 F.2d 827 (3d Cir. 1949)

Opinion

Nos. 9900, 9899.

Argued May 3, 1949.

Decided May 9, 1949. Rehearing Denied August 16, 1949.

Petitions to Review Decisions of the Tax Court of the United States.

Norman S. Altman, Washington, D.C. (Harry Shapiro, Hirsh W. Stalberg, David V. Shapiro, and Shapiro, Conner, Rosenfeld Stalberg, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner.

Sumner N. Redstone, Washington, D.C. (Theron Lamar Caudle, Assistant Attorney General, and Ellis N. Slack, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before MARIS, GOODRICH, and McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judges.


The question raised by these petitions is whether the partnership interests held by the trusts created by the petitioners for their children are entitled to tax recognition under the doctrine of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Tower, 1946, 327 U.S. 280, 66 S.Ct. 532, 90 L.Ed. 670, 164 A.L.R. 1135, and Lusthaus v. Commissioner, 1946, 327 U.S. 293, 66 S.Ct. 539, 90 L.Ed. 679. Upon the findings of fact of the Tax Court, which we cannot say are clearly erroneous, and for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Judge Opper for that court, ___ T.C. ___, we conclude that those interests are not entitled to such recognition.

The decisions of the Tax Court will be affirmed.


Summaries of

Eisenberg v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
May 9, 1949
174 F.2d 827 (3d Cir. 1949)
Case details for

Eisenberg v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Morris EISENBERG, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: May 9, 1949

Citations

174 F.2d 827 (3d Cir. 1949)