From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Einstein v. Climax Cycle Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1897
13 App. Div. 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)

Opinion

January Term, 1897.

Present — Van Brunt, P.J., Barrett, Rumsey, Williams and Patterson, JJ.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. —


This is a motion made by a junior attaching creditor to set aside an attachment procured by the plaintiff. The ground upon which the attachment was vacated was the insufficiency of the affidavit upon which it was granted. That affidavit was made by the assignee of the claim sued upon, and he asserted the facts constituting the cause of action to be within his own knowledge, but did not disclose his means of knowledge nor give any information as to how that alleged knowledge was obtained. The case, therefore, comes within the ruling made in Hoormann v. Climax Cycle Co. ( 9 App. Div. 579), and the order should be affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Einstein v. Climax Cycle Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 1, 1897
13 App. Div. 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)
Case details for

Einstein v. Climax Cycle Company

Case Details

Full title:George Einstein, Appellant, v. Climax Cycle Company, Defendant. Eli M…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1897

Citations

13 App. Div. 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)

Citing Cases

Reitmeister v. Reitmeister

He alleges that there is such a balance of upwards of $30,000. It is incumbent on an applicant for a warrant…

Price v. Levy

No facts are stated from which the court can see, or even infer, that the maker of the affidavit had any…