stating that "[c]ase law is explicitly clear that, notice received by means other than those authorized by statute does not bring a defendant within the jurisdiction of the court" and dismissing for failure to file proof of service documenting that any of § 308's requirements had been met
Summary of this case from Stop Shop Supermarket Company LLC v. GoldsmithMay 5, 2006.
Process — Service of Process.
stating that "[c]ase law is explicitly clear that, notice received by means other than those authorized by statute does not bring a defendant within the jurisdiction of the court" and dismissing for failure to file proof of service documenting that any of § 308's requirements had been met
Summary of this case from Stop Shop Supermarket Company LLC v. GoldsmithFull title:Einheber v. Bodenheimer
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date published: May 5, 2006
13a (2011 ed.) ("[D]elivery and mailing are essential in order to obtain jurisdiction over the defendant."…
Ruffin v. N. Shore Univ. Hosp. at Forest Hills( Thomas v Alleyne, 302 AD2d 36, 38). Herein, since plaintiff fails to make this showing, the affirmations of…