From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eifs, Inc. v. Morie Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 19, 2001
281 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted January 24, 2001.

March 19, 2001.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract and breach of warranty, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia, J.), dated March 29, 2000, which granted the plaintiff's motion for leave to serve and file an amended complaint.

Cozen O'Connor, New York, N.Y. (Monique Noel Thoresz of counsel), for appellant.

Thaler Gertler, LLP, Westbury, N.Y. (Harold J. Levy of counsel), for respondent.

Before: LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, P.J., SONDRA MILLER, LEO F. McGINITY, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Leave to amend pleadings "shall be freely given", absent prejudice or surprise resulting directly from the delay (CPLR 3025[b]; see, McCaskey, Davies Assoc. v. New York City Health Hosps. Corp., 59 N.Y.2d 755). Here, the defendant failed to demonstrate that the amended complaint would result in prejudice or surprise. Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff's motion (see, Murray v. City of New York, 43 N.Y.2d 400, 405).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Eifs, Inc. v. Morie Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 19, 2001
281 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Eifs, Inc. v. Morie Co.

Case Details

Full title:Eifs, Inc., respondent, v. Morie Company, Inc., appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 19, 2001

Citations

281 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
721 N.Y.S.2d 802

Citing Cases

EIFS, INC. v. MORIE COMPANY

Since the defendant could have raised its standing argument on a prior appeal, and it failed to set forth any…