From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eiffert v. Chase

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 6, 2010
NO. CIV. S-10-1687 LKK/KJM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2010)

Opinion

NO. CIV. S-10-1687 LKK/KJM.

July 6, 2010


ORDER


It has come to the court's attention that the court has opened a minimal account for his daughter with Washington Mutual Bank. Upon review and consideration of the case, the court determines that this interest presents no conflict in the fair adjudication of the case and that recusal is not necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Eiffert v. Chase

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 6, 2010
NO. CIV. S-10-1687 LKK/KJM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2010)
Case details for

Eiffert v. Chase

Case Details

Full title:JAMES L. EIFFERT, TERRI L. EIFFERT, and TEDDY ENTERPRISES, a California…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 6, 2010

Citations

NO. CIV. S-10-1687 LKK/KJM (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2010)