From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eidam v. James

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 9, 2022
No. 21-11579 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 9, 2022)

Opinion

21-11579

03-09-2022

JASON RICHARD EIDAM, Plaintiff, v. ANGELE JAMES, Defendant.


Thomas L. Ludington United States District Judge

ORDER FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING BY DEFENDANT

CURTIS IVY, JR. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On or about February 18, 2022, the U.S. Marshals Service effected service on Defendant Angele James. (ECF No. 14). As indicated on the returned waiver of service form, an answer to the complaint was due March 8, 2022 (60 days from the day it was sent). On March 8th, counsel appeared for James and filed a demand for a jury trial but did not file an answer or other response to the complaint. The Court, having reviewed plaintiff's complaint in its entirety, finds that Defendant may not waive filing a responsive pleading pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g). Therefore, it is ORDERED Defendant shall file an appropriate responsive pleading to Plaintiff's complaint by March 23, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Eidam v. James

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Mar 9, 2022
No. 21-11579 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Eidam v. James

Case Details

Full title:JASON RICHARD EIDAM, Plaintiff, v. ANGELE JAMES, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Mar 9, 2022

Citations

No. 21-11579 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 9, 2022)