From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eichler v. Tilton

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 19, 2011
No. CIV S-06-2894-JAM-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-2894-JAM-CMK-P.

January 19, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is a motion for reconsideration (Doc. 132) of the Magistrate Judge's September 20, 2010 order.

Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's order shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. The September 20, 2010, order is, therefore, affirmed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The motion for reconsideration (Doc. 132) is denied;
2. The Magistrate Judge's September 20, 2010, order is affirmed; and
3. No further motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered.

DATED: January 18, 2011


Summaries of

Eichler v. Tilton

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 19, 2011
No. CIV S-06-2894-JAM-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Eichler v. Tilton

Case Details

Full title:DWAYNE EICHLER, Plaintiff, v. TILTON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 19, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-06-2894-JAM-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2011)