From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eichler v. Subia

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 6, 2007
No. CIV S-07-0516 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-0516 GEB DAD P.

December 6, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's November 28, 2007 request for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Eichler v. Subia

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 6, 2007
No. CIV S-07-0516 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2007)
Case details for

Eichler v. Subia

Case Details

Full title:DWAYNE EICHLER, Petitioner, v. J. SUBIA, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 6, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-07-0516 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2007)