From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

EHRHEART v. BOSE CORPORATION

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 4, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-350 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 4, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-350.

January 4, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


On March 19, 2007, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Amy Reynolds Hay for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

On December 10, 2007 the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38) regarding Bose's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 18). The magistrate judge recommended that the District Court deny this Motion. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made on the parties. Objections (Doc. 40) were filed were filed on December 20, 2007. These Objections have been carefully reviewed. The Defendants argue that the Magistrate erred in construing the term "point of sale" as it was used in FACTA, and that Bose has no liability to the Plaintiff whether the term is viewed as describing a geographical point or a point in time. In the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 36), these issues were discussed in detail against the background of the case law, and Bose's position was rejected. The Plaintiff did not file a Response to Bose's Objections.

After a review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the Objections thereto, the following ORDER is entered:

AND NOW, this 4 day of January 2008 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Bose's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 18) is DENIED

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Hay dated December 3, 2007 (Doc. 36) is hereby adopted as the opinion of the court.


Summaries of

EHRHEART v. BOSE CORPORATION

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 4, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-350 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 4, 2008)
Case details for

EHRHEART v. BOSE CORPORATION

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLE EHRHEART, individually and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 4, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-350 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 4, 2008)

Citing Cases

Turner v. Matador Argentinian Steakhouse, Corp.

The Court notes that another district court has also taken the position that § 1681c(g) only applies to…

Todd v. Target Corp.

Keller v. Macon County Greyhound Park, No. 07 CV 1098, 2011 WL 1085976, at *6 (M.D. Ala. Mar. 24, 2011), did…