From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ehret v. George Ringler Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 2, 1912
98 N.E. 1102 (N.Y. 1912)

Opinion

Argued January 30, 1912

Decided February 2, 1912

John M. Bowers and W.H. Van Benschoten for appellants.

David Leventritt, Maxwell C. Katz and Otto C. Sommerich for respondents.

Charles A. Collin and John B. Stanchfield for Anna Hachemeister, individually, intervening.


Appeal dismissed, without costs to either party, and without prejudice to a renewal of the application to the Supreme Court, the situation having so changed since the decision of the Appellate Division that the question certified is no longer controlling on the rights of the parties, and this court is confined to a decision of the question certified; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK, CHASE and COLLIN, JJ.


Summaries of

Ehret v. George Ringler Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 2, 1912
98 N.E. 1102 (N.Y. 1912)
Case details for

Ehret v. George Ringler Company

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE EHRET, JR., et al., as Executors of WILLIAM G. RINGLER, Deceased…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 2, 1912

Citations

98 N.E. 1102 (N.Y. 1912)
98 N.E. 1102