In re E.H.

Full title: In the Interest of E.H., a child. N.D.H., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF…

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Dec 1, 2017

Case No. 2D17-2884 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Dec. 1, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 2D17-2884

12-01-2017

In the Interest of E.H., a child. N.D.H., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and the GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM, Appellees.

Norman A. Palumbo, Jr., Tampa, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mary Soorus, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee Department of Children and Families. David P. Krupski, Sanford, and Morgan Lyle Weinstein of Weinstein Law, P.A., Hollywood, for Appellee Guardian ad Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Laura E. Ward, Judge. Norman A. Palumbo, Jr., Tampa, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mary Soorus, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee Department of Children and Families. David P. Krupski, Sanford, and Morgan Lyle Weinstein of Weinstein Law, P.A., Hollywood, for Appellee Guardian ad Litem Program. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. KELLY, SLEET, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.