From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Egger v. Cnty. of Riverside

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 19, 2024
5:24-cv-01439-SSS-DTBx (C.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2024)

Opinion

5:24-cv-01439-SSS-DTBx

11-19-2024

Brooke Egger v. County of Riverside, et al.


Present: The Honorable SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES- GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DOE DEFENDANTS

On August 8, 2024, Plaintiff Brooke Egger filed her First Amended Complaint in which numerous Doe defendants are listed. [See Dkt. 16, First Am. Compl. (“FAC”), at 3-4 ¶¶ 13-14]. As of the date of this order, there is no evidence in the record to show Plaintiff has timely served these defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).

Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Doe defendants should not be dismissed for failure to name and serve a copy of the summons and First Amended Complaint on these defendants. Plaintiff must respond in writing by December 19, 2024. Failure to respond will result in a dismissal of the Doe Defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and failure to obey court orders.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Egger v. Cnty. of Riverside

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 19, 2024
5:24-cv-01439-SSS-DTBx (C.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2024)
Case details for

Egger v. Cnty. of Riverside

Case Details

Full title:Brooke Egger v. County of Riverside, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 19, 2024

Citations

5:24-cv-01439-SSS-DTBx (C.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2024)