From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Egbert v. Bingham Brothers Company

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 27, 1938
166 Misc. 663 (N.Y. App. Term 1938)

Opinion

January 27, 1938.

Appeal from the Municipal Court in the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, First District.

John A. Mullen, for the appellant.

David J. Rosen [ George P. Kurtz of counsel], for the respondent.


The defendant corporation is a stockholder of the International Madison Bank Trust Co. and as such is subject to the assessment imposed upon it by the Superintendent of Banks pursuant to sections 80 Banking and 120 Banking of the Banking Law. The defendant corporation could have relieved itself of liability if it had complied with the provisions of section 496 Banking of the Banking Law. Having failed to pursue this remedy the defendant corporation did not cease to be a member of the corporation in which it held stock. The defense of ultra vires is without merit. ( Vought v. Eastern Bldg. Loan Assn., 172 N.Y. 508.)

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff as prayed for in the complaint.

All concur. Present — HAMMER, SHIENTAG and NOONAN, JJ.


Summaries of

Egbert v. Bingham Brothers Company

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 27, 1938
166 Misc. 663 (N.Y. App. Term 1938)
Case details for

Egbert v. Bingham Brothers Company

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE W. EGBERT, as Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jan 27, 1938

Citations

166 Misc. 663 (N.Y. App. Term 1938)
2 N.Y.S.2d 976