From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Egbert v. Adler

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
Feb 6, 1936
158 Misc. 461 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1936)

Opinion

February 6, 1936.

Carl J. Austrian [ Harold N. Cohen of counsel], for the plaintiff.

Zalkin Cohen [ Jack Cohen of counsel], for the defendant Isidore Levy.


This is a motion to dismiss the second defense for alleged insufficiency. The gist of the defense is that the plaintiff having obtained a judgment against the record owner of stock of the Bank of United States at the time said bank was taken over by the Superintendent of Banks, the present action against one claimed to be the actual owner of said stock may not be maintained. This defense appears to be without merit. In Broderick v. Aaron ( 264 N.Y. 368) the Court of Appeals held that the actual owner of bank stock "shared the liability of the holder of record of the same stock" (p. 373).

The motion to dismiss the defense is accordingly granted, with ten dollars costs. Order signed.


Summaries of

Egbert v. Adler

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
Feb 6, 1936
158 Misc. 461 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1936)
Case details for

Egbert v. Adler

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE W. EGBERT, as Superintendent of Banks, Plaintiff, v. PEARL ADLER…

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County

Date published: Feb 6, 1936

Citations

158 Misc. 461 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1936)
285 N.Y.S. 430