Opinion
No. 82017
12-16-2020
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a district court order denying a summary judgment motion. Having considered the petition and its supporting documentation, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). In particular, we generally will not consider writ petitions challenging orders denying summary judgment, and we are not convinced that any exception to that general rule applies here. See Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 113 Nev. 1343, 1344-45, 950 P.2d 280, 281 (1997) (recognizing that this court will generally not consider writ petitions challenging the denial of a motion for summary judgment). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
/s/_________, J.
Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Stiglich
/s/_________, J.
Silver cc: Hon. Tierra Danielle Jones, District Judge
McKay Law Firm Chtd.
Bighorn Law/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk