Opinion
September 30, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Cornelius, J.
Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Balio, Wesley and Callahan, JJ.
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: The rolfing treatments received by Claudia P. Egan (plaintiff) are not "other professional health services" under Insurance Law § 5102 (a) (1) (iv) because rolfing is not a service licensed by the State of New York (see, 11 NYCRR 65.15 [o] [1] [vi]). Nevertheless, there is a question of fact whether the rolfing treatments received by plaintiff were a necessary treatment to restore her health so that they may qualify as "rehabilitation" under Insurance Law § 5102 (a) (1) (ii) (see, Hernandez v. Aetna Cas. Sur. Co., 146 Misc.2d 938, 941).