From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hunter v. Marshall

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Feb 8, 2018
Cause number: 01-16-00636-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 8, 2018)

Opinion

Cause number: 01-16-00636-CV

02-08-2018

Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC v. Preston Marshall, Individually and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C.


ORDER ON MOTION

Type of motion: Stacy D. Blank's Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice and Unopposed Motion of Resident Attorney Lawrence Bradley Hancock in Support of Pro Hac Vice Admission for Stacy D. Blank Party filing motion: Stacy D. Blank and Lawrence Bradley Hancock, Counsel for Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC Ordered that motion is:

[v] Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

[ ] Denied

[ ] Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

[ ] Other: ____________________
Judge's signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

[v] Acting individually [ ] Acting for the Court Date: February 8, 2018


Summaries of

Hunter v. Marshall

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Feb 8, 2018
Cause number: 01-16-00636-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 8, 2018)
Case details for

Hunter v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC v. Preston Marshall…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Date published: Feb 8, 2018

Citations

Cause number: 01-16-00636-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 8, 2018)