From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edwards v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
May 24, 2019
CASE NO. 4:19 CR 654 (N.D. Ohio May. 24, 2019)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:19 CR 654

05-24-2019

ODELL EDWARDS, Petitioner, v. MARK WILLIAMS, WARDEN, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court upon Petitioner, Odell Edwards' pro se Motion For Award of Good Time Under 28 U.S.C. §2241, and Motion to Expedite §2241. (ECF # 1, 3). Mr. Edwards motion seeks to force the Bureau of Prisons to award him additional good time credits pursuant to section 102(b)(1)(A) of the First Step Act, which he claims would entitle him to immediate release. Mr. Edwards also indicated in his motion, however, that without consideration of such additional credits he would be scheduled for release on May 2, 2019.

When Mr. Edwards filed his motion, he failed to pay the filing fee of $5.00, or to complete and submit an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Court issued an Order informing Mr. Edwards that he must either pay the fee or file the Application by May 23, 2019, or face dismissal of this action. That deadline has passed and Mr. Edwards has not paid the fee, or filed the Application. Further, according to the representations made in his motion, Mr. Edwards would have been released from custody as of May 2, 2019, which renders his motion moot.

Mr. Edward's request for the application of additional good-time credits, would also fail on the merits. Although Section 102(b) of the First Step Act amends 18 U.S.C. §3624(b) to allow up to 54 day of good conduct time for each year of incarceration imposed by the court, as opposed to each year of actual time served, the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") continues to have exclusive jurisdiction to determine sentence credits. United States v. Wilson, 503 U.S. 329, 335 (1992). This Court has no authority to award sentencing credits. United States v. Cobleigh, 75 F.3d 242, 251 (6th Cir. 1996). Further, this provision of the First Step Act does not take effect until the Attorney General completes and releases the risk and needs assessment system under Section 101(a) of the Act. which is currently required to be by July 19, 2019. See, 18 U.S.C. §3632(a).

For these reasons, Mr. Edward's Motion For Award of Good Time Under 28 U.S.C. §2241, and Motion to Expedite §2241 are DENIED, and this action is dismissed. (ECF # 1,3). IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

DONALD C. NUGENT

United States District Judge DATED: May 24, 2019


Summaries of

Edwards v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
May 24, 2019
CASE NO. 4:19 CR 654 (N.D. Ohio May. 24, 2019)
Case details for

Edwards v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:ODELL EDWARDS, Petitioner, v. MARK WILLIAMS, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: May 24, 2019

Citations

CASE NO. 4:19 CR 654 (N.D. Ohio May. 24, 2019)