From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edwards v. Venettozzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 23, 2009
61 A.D.3d 1224 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 504977.

April 23, 2009.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Gerald Edwards, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Peters, J.P., Rose, Lahtinen, Malone Jr. and McCarthy, JJ.


Petitioner was charged in two misbehavior reports with assaulting staff, engaging in violent conduct, refusing direct orders, creating a disturbance, interfering with staff and violating facility frisk procedures after, among other things, he punched one correction officer in the face and, a short time later, attempted to kick another correction officer. Following a combined tier HI disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges and a penalty was imposed. Petitioner's administrative appeal was unsuccessful, and he thereafter commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking to annul the determination of guilt.

We confirm. Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the detailed misbehavior reports, together with the testimony adduced at the hearing, constitute substantial evidence of his guilt ( see Matter of Perez v Dubray, 55 AD3d 1119; Matter of Benson v Selsky, 50 AD3d 1347). Although petitioner denied engaging in the offending conduct and contended that correction officers assaulted him without provocation, this presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Benson v Selsky, supra; Matter of Morillo v Goord, 38 AD3d 947, 947-948). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his assertion that he was denied the right to call witnesses to testify on his behalf, have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Edwards v. Venettozzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 23, 2009
61 A.D.3d 1224 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Edwards v. Venettozzi

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GERALD EDWARDS, Petitioner, v. D. VENETTOZZI, as Acting…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 23, 2009

Citations

61 A.D.3d 1224 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 3066
877 N.Y.S.2d 513

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Rock

We confirm. The misbehavior report and testimony adduced at the hearing provide substantial evidence to…

In re Stanley Brown

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officers familiar with the…