Opinion
1:11CV77.
April 18, 2011
ORDER
The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on March 2, 2011, was served on the parties in this action. Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation. (Doc. 5.)
The court has reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination, which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. 1) be, and the same is hereby, DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.