From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edwards v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 5, 2003
859 So. 2d 538 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 4D02-1739.

Opinion filed November 5, 2003

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Peter M. Weinstein, Judge; L.T. Case No. 98-15185 CF 10A.

Collie T. Edwards, Belle Glade, pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Donna M. Hoffmann, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


The trial court's order denying Edwards's post-conviction motion is affirmed. As to his claim that his attorney was ineffective for failing to call certain witnesses, in order to set forth a facially sufficient claim, a post-conviction motion must allege that the witness was available to testify. See Catis v. State, 741 So.2d 1140 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 735 So.2d 1284 (Fla. 1999); Nelson v. State, 816 So.2d 694 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Puig v. State, 636 So.2d 121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Highsmith v. State, 617 So.2d 825 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

Accordingly, we certify conflict with Odom v. State, 770 So.2d 195 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

STONE, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL DISPOSITION OF ANY TIMELY FILED MOTION FOR REHEARING.


Summaries of

Edwards v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 5, 2003
859 So. 2d 538 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Edwards v. State

Case Details

Full title:COLLIE T. EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 5, 2003

Citations

859 So. 2d 538 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Milton v. State

To set forth a facially sufficient claim, a post-conviction motion must allege that the witness was available…