From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edwards v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Dec 1, 1937
110 S.W.2d 917 (Tex. Crim. App. 1937)

Opinion

No. 19239.

Delivered December 1, 1937.

New Trial — Evidence.

Where no statement of facts or bills of exception appear in the record, reviewing court unable to appraise the matters presented in the motion for new trial.

Appeal from the District Court of Eastland County. Hon. B. W. Patterson, Judge.

Appeal from conviction for burglary; penalty, confinement in penitentiary for two years.

Affirmed.

The opinion states the case.

Jack W. Frost and M. E. Lawrence, both of Eastland, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


The offense is burglary; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular. The evidence adduced upon the trial is not brought forward for review. No complaint of the ruling of the trial court has been presented by bill of exception. In the absence of the evidence heard before the trial judge, this court is unable to appraise the matters presented in the motion for new trial.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Edwards v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Dec 1, 1937
110 S.W.2d 917 (Tex. Crim. App. 1937)
Case details for

Edwards v. State

Case Details

Full title:LARRY EDWARDS v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Dec 1, 1937

Citations

110 S.W.2d 917 (Tex. Crim. App. 1937)
110 S.W.2d 917