From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Edwards v. Hooks

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 27, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1595 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1595 MCE DAD P.

March 27, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's March 13, 2007 motion for the appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Edwards v. Hooks

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 27, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1595 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2007)
Case details for

Edwards v. Hooks

Case Details

Full title:LARRY EDWARDS, Plaintiff, v. C/O HOOKS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 27, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1595 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2007)