Opinion
No. 68464
09-11-2015
PAUL D.S. EDWARDS, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE DOUGLAS W. HERNDON, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and NND AGENCY, INC.; DENARDO AGENCY, A/K/A THE DENARDO AGENCY, A/K/A NATALIE N. DENARDO AGENCY; AND NATALIE NICOLE DENARDO, A/K/A NATALIE N. DENARDO, A/K/A NATALIE DENARDO, Real Parties in Interest.
An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION
This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenging a district court partial summary judgment in a telephone consumer protection action. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that petitioner met his burden to demonstrate that our extraordinary discretionary intervention is warranted. NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 113 Nev. 1343, 1344, 950 P.2d 280, 281 (1997). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
/s/_________, J.
Parraguirre
/s/_________, J.
Douglas
/s/_________, J.
Cherry
cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge
Paul D.S. Edwards
Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara, LLP
Eighth District Court Clerk